MAŠA

PEOPLE

SCENERY

DIARY

ABOUT

Projects . User Questionnaire

MAŠA

PEOPLE

SCENERY

DIARY

ABOUT

Projects . User Questionnaire

MAŠA

PEOPLE

SCENERY

DIARY

ABOUT

Projects . User Questionnaire

Product Lead

UX Lead



Product Lead

UX Lead

User research Survey design

To complement existing usability metrics with deeper insights into how software influences users' feelings of stress or calm, their productivity, and how well it aligns with their future needs.

Learn more

  • The software significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Next

  • I often find the software lacking in areas that are critical to my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software, in its current state, closely aligns with my requirements for enhancing efficiency and focus.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Many elements of the software do not align with what my workflow requires.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Using this software has positively impacted my productivity and peace of mind in its current usage.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I frequently face issues with the software that hinder my productivity and cause me stress or frustration.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am optimistic about the software’s potential to evolve and meet my future needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am doubtful about the software's ability to adapt and fulfil my evolving needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software aligns well with my vision of how technology should enhance my day-to-day activities and promote a relaxed, calm experience.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software contributes to stress or frustration, falling short of enhancing my daily activities as I had hoped or envisioned.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Finnish

Role:

I am responsible for overseeing the product strategy, coordinating with engineering and design teams, and ensuring the platform meets the needs of our target users. As an expert UX practitioner, I also lead User research & Usability tests

Overview:

To complement existing usability metrics with deeper insights into how software influences users' feelings of stress or calm, their productivity, and how well it aligns with their future needs.

Process:

  • Identifying the Need

  • Designing the Scale

  • Questionnaire Construction

  • Pilot Testing

  • Implementation and Analysis

Results:

  • Enhanced Understanding

  • Future Expectations: Feedback on future expectations helped prioritise development efforts

  • Correlation Insights: Interesting correlations between usability scores (SUS) and emotional impact scores (SIES), providing a more nuanced view of the overall user experience.

Role:

I am responsible for overseeing the product strategy, coordinating with engineering and design teams, and ensuring the platform meets the needs of our target users. As an expert UX practitioner, I also lead User research & Usability tests

Overview:

To complement existing usability metrics with deeper insights into how software influences users' feelings of stress or calm, their productivity, and how well it aligns with their future needs.

Process:

  • Identifying the Need

  • Designing the Scale

  • Questionnaire Construction

  • Pilot Testing

  • Implementation and Analysis

Results:

  • Enhanced Understanding

  • Future Expectations: Feedback on future expectations helped prioritise development efforts

  • Correlation Insights: Interesting correlations between usability scores (SUS) and emotional impact scores (SIES), providing a more nuanced view of the overall user experience.

Role:

I am responsible for overseeing the product strategy, coordinating with engineering and design teams, and ensuring the platform meets the needs of our target users. As an expert UX practitioner, I also lead User research & Usability tests

Overview:

To complement existing usability metrics with deeper insights into how software influences users' feelings of stress or calm, their productivity, and how well it aligns with their future needs.

Process:

  • Identifying the Need

  • Designing the Scale

  • Questionnaire Construction

  • Pilot Testing

  • Implementation and Analysis

Results:

  • Enhanced Understanding

  • Future Expectations: Feedback on future expectations helped prioritise development efforts

  • Correlation Insights: Interesting correlations between usability scores (SUS) and emotional impact scores (SIES), providing a more nuanced view of the overall user experience.

Role:

I am responsible for overseeing the product strategy, coordinating with engineering and design teams, and ensuring the platform meets the needs of our target users. As an expert UX practitioner, I also lead User research & Usability tests

Overview:

To complement existing usability metrics with deeper insights into how software influences users' feelings of stress or calm, their productivity, and how well it aligns with their future needs.

Process:

  • Identifying the Need

  • Designing the Scale

  • Questionnaire Construction

  • Pilot Testing

  • Implementation and Analysis

Results:

  • Enhanced Understanding

  • Future Expectations: Feedback on future expectations helped prioritise development efforts

  • Correlation Insights: Interesting correlations between usability scores (SUS) and emotional impact scores (SIES), providing a more nuanced view of the overall user experience.

Process

  1. Identifying the Need

Conducting preliminary research, including reviewing existing literature on usability and user experience, analyzing feedback on our current products, and identifying gaps in our understanding of user experience.


  1. Designing the Scale

Outlined the key areas the SIES needed to address: current impact on tasks and workflow, alignment with workflow requirements, effect on productivity and emotional state, future potential and adaptability, and overall user experience and expectations.


  1. Questionnaire Construction

Developed a set of statements for each area, using a Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree) for responses.


  1. Pilot Testing

The initial version of the SIES was pilot-tested with a small user group.

The Questionnaire

  • Focus: Assesses the current impact of software on users' tasks and productivity, as well as their expectations and visions for the future.


  • Content: Contains 10 questions, alternating between positive and negative aspects, covering the current effect on tasks and future potential.


  • Purpose: Aims to understand how the software influences users' day-to-day activities and their long-term expectations. It captures the emotional and practical impact of the software.


  • Importance: Understanding the impact and expectations helps in aligning the software with user needs and aspirations. It informs developers and designers about what users value and expect, guiding future improvements and features.

  • The software significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Next

  • I often find the software lacking in areas that are critical to my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software, in its current state, closely aligns with my requirements for enhancing efficiency and focus.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Many elements of the software do not align with what my workflow requires.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Using this software has positively impacted my productivity and peace of mind in its current usage.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I frequently face issues with the software that hinder my productivity and cause me stress or frustration.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am optimistic about the software’s potential to evolve and meet my future needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am doubtful about the software's ability to adapt and fulfil my evolving needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software aligns well with my vision of how technology should enhance my day-to-day activities and promote a relaxed, calm experience.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software contributes to stress or frustration, falling short of enhancing my daily activities as I had hoped or envisioned.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Finnish

Google Document

Typeform

Process

  1. Identifying the Need

Conducting preliminary research, including reviewing existing literature on usability and user experience, analyzing feedback on our current products, and identifying gaps in our understanding of user experience.


  1. Designing the Scale

Outlined the key areas the SIES needed to address: current impact on tasks and workflow, alignment with workflow requirements, effect on productivity and emotional state, future potential and adaptability, and overall user experience and expectations.


  1. Questionnaire Construction

Developed a set of statements for each area, using a Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree) for responses.


  1. Pilot Testing

The initial version of the SIES was pilot-tested with a small user group.

The Questionnaire

  • Focus: Assesses the current impact of software on users' tasks and productivity, as well as their expectations and visions for the future.


  • Content: Contains 10 questions, alternating between positive and negative aspects, covering the current effect on tasks and future potential.


  • Purpose: Aims to understand how the software influences users' day-to-day activities and their long-term expectations. It captures the emotional and practical impact of the software.


  • Importance: Understanding the impact and expectations helps in aligning the software with user needs and aspirations. It informs developers and designers about what users value and expect, guiding future improvements and features.

Google Document

Google Document

Typeform

Typeform

  • The software significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Next

  • I often find the software lacking in areas that are critical to my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software, in its current state, closely aligns with my requirements for enhancing efficiency and focus.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Many elements of the software do not align with what my workflow requires.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Using this software has positively impacted my productivity and peace of mind in its current usage.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I frequently face issues with the software that hinder my productivity and cause me stress or frustration.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am optimistic about the software’s potential to evolve and meet my future needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am doubtful about the software's ability to adapt and fulfil my evolving needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software aligns well with my vision of how technology should enhance my day-to-day activities and promote a relaxed, calm experience.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software contributes to stress or frustration, falling short of enhancing my daily activities as I had hoped or envisioned.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Finnish

Process

  1. Identifying the Need

Conducting preliminary research, including reviewing existing literature on usability and user experience, analyzing feedback on our current products, and identifying gaps in our understanding of user experience.


  1. Designing the Scale

Outlined the key areas the SIES needed to address: current impact on tasks and workflow, alignment with workflow requirements, effect on productivity and emotional state, future potential and adaptability, and overall user experience and expectations.


  1. Questionnaire Construction

Developed a set of statements for each area, using a Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree) for responses.


  1. Pilot Testing

The initial version of the SIES was pilot-tested with a small user group.

The Questionnaire

Focus: Assesses the current impact of software on users' tasks and productivity, as well as their expectations and visions for the future.


Content: Contains 10 questions, alternating between positive and negative aspects, covering the current effect on tasks and future potential.


Purpose: Aims to understand how the software influences users' day-to-day activities and their long-term expectations. It captures the emotional and practical impact of the software.


Importance: Understanding the impact and expectations helps in aligning the software with user needs and aspirations. It informs developers and designers about what users value and expect, guiding future improvements and features.

Google Document

Typeform

  • The software significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Next

  • I often find the software lacking in areas that are critical to my tasks and workflows.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software, in its current state, closely aligns with my requirements for enhancing efficiency and focus.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Many elements of the software do not align with what my workflow requires.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • Using this software has positively impacted my productivity and peace of mind in its current usage.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I frequently face issues with the software that hinder my productivity and cause me stress or frustration.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am optimistic about the software’s potential to evolve and meet my future needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • I am doubtful about the software's ability to adapt and fulfil my evolving needs and expectations.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software aligns well with my vision of how technology should enhance my day-to-day activities and promote a relaxed, calm experience.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Next

  • The software contributes to stress or frustration, falling short of enhancing my daily activities as I had hoped or envisioned.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Previous

    Finnish

Next Project

Klevio - Smart Doorphone

Learn More

Next Project

Klevio - Smart Doorphone

Learn More

©️ 2023 Sinteza. All rights reserved.